TK Study

Timber › Notes › The exam, the question bank and where the marks are

The exam, the question bank and where the marks are

Written exam: Wednesday 4 November 2026, 1:55–3:30 pm (5 min reading + 1 h 30 min). 40 marks, worth 40% of the HSC exam mark; the Major Project (product + design, management and communication folio) is the other 60% and is marked separately. Confirm the date and room on your Students Online personal timetable.

Section Format Marks Suggested time What it tests
I Q1–10 multiple choice 10 20 min Tools, joints, conversion, boards, adhesives, fittings, finishes, simple calculations
II Q11–15 short answer (1–5 marks each, total 15) 15 35 min Timber focus-area content; usually one calculation
III Q16 (a) 3–5 marks + (b) 10–12 marks 15 35 min Industry Study (common to all focus areas), answered with timber/furniture examples

Question bank: Sections II and III, 2015–2025 (official NESA papers)

Year Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16(a) Q16(b)
2025 Drawer measuring step (2) Carcase joint characteristic (2) Band saw vs table saw use (2) Bending process for curved legs (4) Machinery set-up/start-up/maintenance (5) Legislation, sustainability, environment (5) Historical developments + manufacturing advances, analyse (10)
2024 Feature adhesive: epoxy (1) Minimise waste strategy (2) Mitre vs compound mitre saw (3) Router feature (4) WHS risks of recycled timber (5) Marketing: hierarchical vs flat firm, compare (5) Structure, production + efficiency, analyse (10)
2023 Cabinet fittings category (1) Environmental benefit of boards (2) Finish cost calc (3) Cutting veneers (4) Air seasoning, explain (5) ONE new technology (3) Mass production + automation, discuss (12)
2022 Machine to dress timber (1) Why EMC matters (2) Stool cost calc (3) Recycling/reusing vs shortages (4) Knock-down fittings benefits (5) WHS legislation role (5) Safety strategies, explain (10)
2021 Identify tool: sliding bevel (1) Kiln vs air seasoning (2) Cutting list + cost (3) Plywood from log (4) Environmental factors, furniture (5) Industrial relations issues (5) Career + training opportunities (10)
2020 Outdoor Australian hardwood (1) Rounded edges, reasons (2) Cutting list (3) Joint for cross support (4) Outdoor finish + steps (5) Environmental factors, new site (5) Strategies to minimise environmental impact, discuss (10)
2019 Plywood property (1) Sketch carcase joint (2) Sheets needed calc (3) Plywood log to sheet (4) Corner rebate joint process (5) New/emerging tech benefits (5) Overcome resistance to new tech, discuss (10)
2018 Tool for glass rebate: router (1) Check frame square (2) Board for bathroom cabinet, justify (3) Inlaying technique (4) Drawer runner advantages (5) Land costs + transport (5) Changes in resource management, evaluate (10)
2017 Tool for internal curve (1) Recycled timber benefits (2) Environmental practices in finishing (3) Dovetail drawer benefits (4) Laminated rocking-chair part (5) Training importance (5) Technical factors + efficiency, analyse (10)
2016 Purpose of face mark (1) Widening joint with power tool (3) Oil vs water finishes, compare (3) Restore chisel edge (3) Boards vs solid for table top (5) Risk assessment purpose (5) Historical developments, explain (10)
2015 Dry cramping purpose (1) Alternate growth rings (3) Alternative to traditional joints (3) Quarter-sawn for fine furniture (3) Laminated veneer stool steps (5) Restructuring and quality control (5) New technology, production + efficiency, assess (10)

Gap and priority analysis

Section III topics by year (Industry Study dot points):

Dot point Years examined Last seen Priority for 2026
Structural (organisation, management, marketing, production/efficiency, restructuring, QC) 2015, 2024 2024 Medium: learn S10/S11
Technical (mechanisation, specialisation, mass production, automation, new technology) 2015, 2017, 2019, 2023 2023 High: most-examined; S4/S5
Environmental and sociological (alternative resources, waste, pollution, sustainability, rehabilitation of sites) 2018, 2020 2020 High: not seen for 5 years; S9
Legislative requirements 2025 (with environment) 2025 Medium: S7
Location 2018, 2020 2020 Medium: S8
Personnel (industrial relations, EEO, unions, contracts, careers, training, multi-skilling) 2017, 2019, 2021 2021 High: due again; S12/S13/S14
WHS (legislation, standards, policing, risk assessment, training, culture, communication) 2016, 2022 2022 High: S1/S2/S3
Historical developments (processes, materials, work practices) 2016, 2025 2025 Lower, but S6 doubles as a technology essay
Never directly asked 2015–2025: rehabilitation of commercial sites; alternative power; workplace culture; WHS communication; specialisation vs multi-skilling; group vs individual contracts – – Know one paragraph on each (see Section 2 notes)

Priority is a judgement from past frequency, not a prediction. NESA can examine any dot point.

Section II pattern: every year has one 1-mark identify question, one or two 2–3 mark questions, a calculation at Q13 every year 2019–2023 (none in Section II in 2015–2018 or 2024–2025, though 2016 had one in multiple choice), one 4-mark process question, and one 5-mark explain/describe question. Repeat topics: laminating/bending (2015, 2017, 2025), plywood/veneers (2019, 2021, 2023), seasoning/EMC (2021, 2022, 2023), manufactured boards (2016, 2018, 2019, 2023), finishes (2016, 2017, 2020), environment/recycling (2017, 2021, 2022, 2024), WHS (2024, 2025), joints/fittings (2015, 2017, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2025). Never asked in Section II, so worth one paragraph each: turning, carving, marquetry/parquetry/intarsia, upholstery and allied materials (glass, metal, polymers), shellac/French polish process, economical sheet layout, adhesive selection (5 marks), hinges/catches/table clips, tree structure.

Common reasons students lost marks (NESA marking feedback 2021–2025): listing instead of describing; answering "advantages/disadvantages" when the question asks for "impact"; general WHS answers instead of risks specific to recycled timber; describing plywood manufacture when asked only about cutting veneers; describing what saws look like instead of their uses; not addressing both parts of a two-part question (e.g. "historical developments and advancements", "sustainable practices and environmental impacts"); no focus-area examples; not showing working and units in calculations.

Key verbs: identify (name it), outline (main features), describe (features + characteristics), explain (cause → effect, "because… therefore"), compare (similarities and differences), analyse (identify components, relationships and implications), discuss (points for and against), evaluate/assess (make a judgement of value with criteria), justify (support with reasons and evidence), recommend (give a course of action with reasons).

Section III notes: the Industry Study (timber products and furniture): overview →