TK Study › Christianity › Notes

Christianity: notes

HSC Studies of Religion II · exam Thursday 22 October 2026

NotesMaster answersPast questionsPractise

1. Your choices

Pope John XXIII (significant person); Saturday/Sunday worship (significant practice); bioethics: sanctity of life + love of neighbour (ethics).

2. Format and mark splits

Format. Since 2021 each Section II question has had three parts covering all three syllabus areas (person or school of thought, ethics, significant practice), in rotating order. The one exception is 2024, which had two ethics parts and one practice part.

Mark splits:

Plan for every area at three lengths:

3. Skeletons

1. Significant person: Pope John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli, pope 1958–1963)

Skeleton (7–8 marks).

New evidence ✓ verified

Master answer → · Practise →

2. Ethics: Bioethics (TWO teachings)

Teaching 1: the sanctity of life.

Teaching 2: love of neighbour / stewardship of the body.

New evidence ✓ verified

Master answer → · Practise →

3. Significant practice: Saturday/Sunday worship

Skeleton.


New evidence ✓ verified

Master answer → · Practise →

4. Quote and evidence bank

Sanctity of life

Love / stewardship

Sunday worship

John XXIII

5. Stimulus and exam tips

Stimulus integration

6. Marker feedback

Marker feedback to obey

Verbatim from the NESA "Marking feedback" sections (exam packs).

2015: Section II — Question 2 – Christianity

Candidates showed strength in these areas:

  • demonstrating sound knowledge of environmental ethics
  • displaying sound knowledge of a significant person and their contribution to the religious tradition
  • writing concise responses with appropriate use of terminology and knowledge of the course content. Candidates need to improve in these areas:
  • applying course content to the question
  • making a clear reference to Christian ethical teachings in relation to the area of study
  • linking the response to the stimulus material
  • distinguishing between ethical teachings and issues
  • supporting an argument/judgment with relevant examples
  • developing a clear understanding of the origin of the ethical teaching.
2016: Section II — Question 2 – Christianity

Candidates showed strengths in these areas:

  • clearly and accurately focusing on the significance of the chosen practice for the Christian community as a whole
  • making reference to the principal beliefs of Christianity
  • including sacred text references effectively to further support the response
  • making sustained and accurate references to the stimulus throughout the response
  • including sacred text references to support an argument
  • making clear and accurate judgments.
  • Candidate need to improve in these areas:
  • focusing on the intent of the question rather than being overly descriptive of the chosen practice
  • focusing on the significance for the individual rather than the community
  • providing too much information rather than using the number of lines provided as a guide to the response required
  • being overly descriptive and biographical in nature
  • providing an overly long response which did not make a clear and sustained reference to the stimulus.
2017: Section II — Question 2(a) – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • demonstrate an accurate understanding of Christianity
  • understand the meaning of the word ‘contribution’ and be able to differentiate between ‘impact’ and ‘contribution’
  • outline in part (a) (i) the full extent of the contribution; for example the work or writings of the significant person or school of thought chosen
  • articulate an understanding of the impact of the significant person or school of thought over time
  • choose a person or school of thought in part (a) (i) significant enough to meet the requirements of part (a) (ii).
2017: Section II — Question 2(b) – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • demonstrate a sound knowledge of Christianity and its ethical teachings in one of the named areas of study
  • express the links between these teachings and the stimulus material provided
  • support arguments with examples and quotes from the New Testament and use examples relevant to the issue/area of study (bioethics, environmental ethics or sexual ethics)
  • demonstrate an understanding of sexual ethics, bioethics or environmental ethics
  • respond to the specific nature of the question as opposed to describing general aspects of Christian ethics.
2018: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • clearly and accurately focus on the significance of the chosen practice for the Christian community as a whole (aii)
  • make clear and accurate judgements in (aii) and (b)
  • include sacred text and other relevant sources effectively to further support the response (b)
  • articulate an understanding of the impact of the significant person or school of thought (b)
  • respond to the specific nature of the question as opposed to describing general aspects of the significant person or school of thought (b). Areas for students to improve include:
  • focusing on the significance for the community rather than the individual (ii)
  • focusing on the intent of the question (aii) and (b)
  • avoiding being overly descriptive and biographical in nature (b)
  • supporting arguments with examples and quotes from specific sources related to the significant person/school of thought (b).
2019: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • accurately and succinctly outline a Christian ethical teaching
  • focus on the link between the ethical teaching and the impact on adherents
  • show a clear link between the practice and the community (b)
  • include sacred text and relevant terminology
  • respond to the specific nature of the question, rather than recounting general information. Areas for students to improve include:
  • clearly linking the ethical teaching from part (ai) to (aii)
  • identifying a specific ethical teaching rather than providing an issue
  • using aspects of the stimulus (b).
2020: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • succinctly indicate the main features of one significant practice
  • provide clear examples of the significance for the community of the chosen practice such as the affirmation of key beliefs in Baptism
  • provide detailed information on the extent to which the person or school of thought encourages adherents to be faithful
  • support a sustained judgement throughout the response (b). Areas for students to improve include:
  • ensuring that they address the main aspects of the question
  • differentiating between the significance of a practice for the community and the individual
  • providing clear, relevant and detailed evidence to support a judgement.
2021: Section II — Questions 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • accurately and succinctly outline a Christian ethical teaching, rather than an ethical issue (a)
  • provide specific examples to support the impact of the person or school of thought (b)
  • provide clear examples of the significance for adherents of the chosen practice and how it builds and strengthens adherents’ lives according to their ‘holy faith’ (c). Areas for students to improve include:
  • identifying a specific ethical teaching rather than providing an issue (a)
  • avoiding being overly descriptive and biographical in nature (b)
  • supporting arguments with examples and quotes from specific sources related to the significant practice (c).
2022: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • accurately and succinctly describe one ethical teaching from one of the three areas: bioethics, sexual ethics or environmental ethics (a)
  • provide clear examples of how the one significant practice selected expresses the principal beliefs of Christianity (b)
  • articulate, using clear examples, how the significant person or school of thought encourages adherents to live in
  • fellowship with one another (c). Areas for students to improve include:
  • identifying a specific ethical teaching rather than describing an issue (a)
  • avoiding being overly descriptive by clearly demonstrating the link between the beliefs and the practice (b)
  • exploring a relevant range of contributions rather than providing overly descriptive and biographical content (c).
2023: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • provide a clear explanation on how one ethical teaching encourages adherents to do good, for example, stewardship applied to environmental ethics (a)
  • demonstrate the link between the significant practice and adherents of Christianity (b)
  • articulate using clear examples how the contribution of the person or school of thought is evident today, for example, St Paul (c). Areas for students to improve include:
  • following the conventions regarding the expected length of the response
  • identifying a specific ethical teaching rather than generalised comments about good behaviour, for example, the sanctity of life (a)
  • drawing out implications of the importance of one significant practice on the adherents of the tradition (b)
  • demonstrating the ongoing contribution of the significant person or school of thought (c)
  • avoiding overly descriptive and biographical content (c).
2024: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • accurately outline one ethical teaching (ai)
  • provide effective links between aspects of the significant practice, beliefs in Christianity and the statement in the question (b). Areas for students to improve include:
  • providing detail about the ethical area through relevant topics and terminology (aii)
  • integrating the statement about practices in each paragraph (b)
  • clearly articulating the principal beliefs of Christianity in connection to significant practices (b).
2025: Section II — Question 24 – Christianity

In better responses, students were able to:

  • express clearly and with relevant supporting evidence how one principal belief within Christianity is expressed within one significant practice (a)
  • use relevant examples to clearly explain Christian ethical teachings (b)
  • provide a judgement, drawing on relevant supporting evidence, of how a significant person or school of thought in Christianity provides direction for a meaningful life for adherents (c). Areas for students to improve include:
  • identifying the principal belief of Christianity using correct terminology (a)
  • providing specific evidence from the practice to clearly demonstrate where the principal belief is expressed within the significant practice (a)
  • making well-supported judgements about the contributions of a significant person or school of thought in providing direction for a meaningful life for adherents (c).

General feedback

Verbatim from the NESA "Marking feedback" sections (exam packs).

2025: General feedback

Students should:

7. Past questions

All Christianity past questions are on the Past questions tab, sorted by year, each with a link to practise it.